Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vincent Gimmelli's avatar

I think some discussion if that is okay. It seems the context of John 5:19, which we have used in terms of ministering to people is not really the context of the chapter. Also, John 5:19 sounds like a limitation and the healing of the man at the pool while others were in need of healing does not fit the rest of the scripture since other passages in the gospels stated Jesus healed those who had need of healing (Luke 9:11). Also, the manifestation of the Spirit, the setting seems to be descriptive rather than descriptive. Seems like Paul is describing the out-workings of God's power to people (some of them being former pagans) who had never seen this stuff (signs and wonders) before. But I love what you wrote. I quoted last Dr. James Dunn on his commentary on Acts, which stated, "Despite the association of bold speech and signs and wonders in the previous two verses, the almost invariable manifestation of the Spirit in Acts is inspired speech (2.4; 4.8; 6.10; 10.45–46; 13.2, 9; 18.25; 19.6; 20.23; 21.4, 11), whereas, somewhat surprisingly, the miracles of Acts are never attributed to the Spirit as such (though note 10.38)." My point is that I wonder if we overuse the idea and thought of being led by the Spirit. Or waiting for the leading of the Spirit. Of course, they are not bad things and they are and can be part of the process in terms of ministering to people. Yet, we do not always overtly see these things even in the Acts of the Apostles. We seem to have made gifts and John 5:19 and "leadings" perhaps much more than what what the person meant or intended?

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts